Operations problems rarely arrive wearing their own name. They show up as a delivery miss the commercial team cannot explain, as margin that thinned quarter over quarter without anyone changing price, as a quality incident that traces back four stations upstream, as a brand-new line that stubbornly refuses to hit the throughput it was designed for. The fix is almost never a tool purchase. It is analytical, engineering, and sequential — process first, systems second, hardware third — and that order is not negotiable.
Sterling Birchmond's Industrial & Operations practice works on factory floors and inside production facilities. The scope is concrete: process design and continuous improvement, statistical process control, production line design and implementation, engineering documentation, and piping isometrics and P&ID deliverables. We work where the product is actually made, and we stay through commissioning. Operations work in this practice sits alongside the firm's transaction support and systems capabilities — many production-floor problems begin as a diligence finding or end as a controls and integration build.
The upstream work — how the operation is structured, how it is measured, how it stays in control. Before any steel is moved or any PLC is rewritten, the process has to be right and the data have to be trustworthy.
We start with a plant walk and a hard look at the numbers the floor actually keeps — not the dashboard in the front office. Bottleneck analysis, capacity modeling, labor balance, a clear read on where throughput is lost between shifts. The output is a prioritized list of interventions, sequenced by what the line can absorb.
Lean, Six Sigma, and Kanban are working tools in our hands, not programs to roll out. Value-stream mapping to find where time is actually spent; DMAIC when variation is the problem and the data will support it; pull systems where WIP has quietly become the constraint. Method follows problem. We do not arrive with a methodology looking for somewhere to apply it.
SPC lives or dies in the first week after go-live. We do the analytical work — chart selection matched to the characteristic, sampling strategy the operation can actually sustain, control limits derived from the process rather than copied from a spec — and then we spend the hours on the floor training the operators who will run the charts. The ones who flinch at the first out-of-control signal are the ones who make SPC stick.
The downstream work — the physical line, the controls, the drawings, the commissioning punch list at 11 PM on a Friday. This is where the process design meets the welders, the integrators, and the first pallet of product.
New line or retrofit, the engineering is the same discipline: layout that respects flow before it respects real-estate convenience, tooling and fixturing sized for takt, automation and controls integration scoped to what the operation can actually maintain once we leave, and a commissioning plan that anticipates the problems nobody wants to write down. We stay on-site through commissioning and into the ramp. A line is not commissioned when it runs once. It is commissioned when it runs the third shift without us.
Production facility infrastructure drifts from its drawings the day the contractor leaves. We produce and reconcile as-built documentation — mechanical, electrical, process and utility — so the next capital project is not a forensic exercise. Ongoing technical support keeps the operators supplied with answers when the drawing and the reality disagree, and closes the loop so the package stays current.
Engineering deliverables produced to the standard that auditors, insurers, and EPC firms expect on first submission rather than third. Isometrics built for fabrication and for the inspector; P&IDs reviewed for line-list integrity, instrument tagging, and the small inconsistencies that become field rework. Applied to production facilities, at a level of detail a working engineer or inspector will recognize.
Most calls reach us the same way. A line is running twenty percent below the throughput it was designed for and the root cause has moved twice. A quality issue has survived three rounds of internal investigation. A commissioning has slipped past its second revised date and the customer is asking questions. A documentation audit is ninety days out and the drawing set is a decade behind the facility. A capacity expansion has been approved and the design work has not started. We take the engagements where the work plays to what we actually do, and we say so plainly when it does not.
Direct enquiries to [email protected].